Case study

Five Competing Brands, One Focused Growth System

29% year-over-year growth on only 15% more ad spend, from a portfolio cut from five brands to three.

Client
PE-backed consumer platform
+29%GROWTH, YEAR OVER YEARFIVE BRANDS CUT TO THREE+15%+29%AD SPENDGROWTHClient results

The challenge

Five acquired brands competing in a commoditized, price-driven category with no post-acquisition go-to-market strategy.

Five brands, each running on its own

A large private equity-backed consumer business ran five acquired brands in an increasingly expensive, commoditized category. The market had gone price-driven, and the brands were competing against each other. Integration had never really happened: each brand still carried its own positioning, messaging, systems, vendors, and marketing priorities.

FIVE BRANDS, EACH ON ITS OWNCOMPETING WITH EACH OTHERONE COMMODITIZED, PRICE-DRIVEN CATEGORYBRAND ABRAND BBRAND CBRAND DBRAND EPOSITIONINGMESSAGINGSYSTEMSVENDORSMARKETING PRIORITIES
FIVE BRANDS, EACH ON ITS OWNCompeting with each other in oneprice-driven categoryBRANDSABCDEPOSITIONINGMESSAGINGSYSTEMSVENDORSPRIORITIES

Six problems underneath

Below the portfolio problem sat six more, from how the brands were positioned to how the marketing team was organized.

  • Value propositions that lacked differentiation
  • Paid media messaging not aligned to consumer intent
  • A marketing model too complex to operate efficiently
  • Homegrown systems, and data that was unavailable or unreliable
  • Vendor relationships not tied to performance
  • A team organized around brands, not consumer targets

The approach

We evaluated the portfolio, clarified what role each brand should play, and rebuilt the performance marketing system around it.

Two tracks, run together

The demand work ran in four steps: an audit of search intent across the category's major keywords, a messaging framework for each brand, paid search copy rewritten for three target brands, and website and landing pages aligned to the ad promise. Alongside it, we reviewed media partners for cost efficiency and performance, and assessed how the marketing team was structured and how it worked. Both tracks fed one system.

TWO TRACKS, RUN TOGETHERTHE DEMAND WORK1Audit search intentacross the category's keywords2Messaging frameworksone for each brand3Paid search copyfor three target brands4Site and landing pagesmatched to the ad promiseALONGSIDE IT5Media partnerscost and performance6Team structurearound consumer targetsA FOCUSEDGROWTH SYSTEM
TWO TRACKS, RUN TOGETHERTHE DEMAND WORK1Audit search intentacross the category's keywords2Messaging frameworksone for each brand3Paid search copyfor three target brands4Site and landing pagesmatched to the ad promiseALONGSIDE IT5Media partnerscost and performance6Team structurearound consumer targetsA FOCUSEDGROWTH SYSTEM
FIVE BRANDS, THREE ROLESBEFOREAFTEROverlappingEach with a role

A role for each brand

The search-intent audit showed what consumers were actually looking for, and where each brand could credibly compete. That is what clarified the role each brand should play.

ONE PROMISE, END TO ENDINTENTADPAGEWhat consumerssearch forPaid searchcopy, rewrittenLanding page,matched to the adTHE SITE KEEPS THE AD'S PROMISE

One promise, end to end

Brand-specific messaging frameworks separated the brands. Paid search copy was rewritten against real consumer intent, and the site was aligned so the on-site experience matched the ad promise.

BRAND SILOS TO CONSUMER TARGETSBY BRANDBY CONSUMER TARGETBeforeAfter

A team built around the consumer

We assessed how the marketing team was structured and how it worked, and recommended moving from teams aligned to brands to a structure built around consumer targets.

The results

Growth came in 29% year over year on only 15% more ad spend.

Growth outpaced spend

Revenue grew 29% year over year while ad spend rose 15%, so growth outpaced spend by roughly two to one. Both bars start from zero, so the gap you see is the gap there was.

REVENUE AGAINST AD SPEND, YEAR OVER YEARAD SPEND+15%REVENUE+29%Growth outpaced spend by roughly two to one.Client results
REVENUE AGAINST AD SPENDYEAR OVER YEARAD SPEND+15%REVENUE+29%Growth outpaced spend by roughly two to one.Client results
ACTIVE BRANDS53FOCUS, AND AN END TO INTERNAL COMPETITIONClient results

Five brands to three

Cutting the active portfolio from five brands to three created focus and ended the internal competition.

EVERY MAJOR KPI IMPROVEDConversion rateUPCustomer acquisition costDOWNAnd every major KPI between themClient results

Every major KPI improved

Every major KPI moved the right way, from conversion rate, which rose, through customer acquisition cost, which fell.

MEDIA PARTNER EXPENSE8.5%OF GROSS MEDIA, BEFOREBROUGHT DOWNGROSS MEDIA100%Client results

Partner costs came down

Media partner expense came down from 8.5% of gross media, once the partners had been reviewed for cost efficiency and performance.

A leaner way to operate

The marketing organization was restructured around consumer targets rather than legacy brand silos, which produced unified objectives, clearer accountability, and a leaner operating model.

Still openThe largest remaining opportunity is SEO, still gated on the CMS rollout across the portfolio.

Why it matters

Private equity-backed platforms often acquire multiple brands before integrating their go-to-market strategy.

What keeps complexity from getting expensive

Without clear brand roles, consistent data, aligned vendors, and a performance-oriented operating model, complexity gets expensive fast. Turning portfolio complexity into a focused growth system is what produced stronger year-over-year growth, better media efficiency, lower partner expense, and a structure that can scale.

WITHOUT THESE, COMPLEXITY GETS EXPENSIVE FASTCLEARBRAND ROLESCONSISTENTDATAALIGNEDVENDORSA PERFORMANCEOPERATING MODELA FOCUSED GROWTH SYSTEM THAT CAN SCALE
WITHOUT THESE, COMPLEXITYGETS EXPENSIVE FASTCLEARBRAND ROLESCONSISTENTDATAALIGNEDVENDORSA PERFORMANCEOPERATING MODELA FOCUSED GROWTH SYSTEMTHAT CAN SCALE

Keep reading

More engagements like this

All fifteen engagements

Apply it to your business

Ready for results like this?

Bring us the growth problem you cannot staff for.

Schedule a conversation